“Many organizations now realize that as much as half of
the electricity they purchase is going into the data center,”
says Jim Barclay, CEO of Business Value Consulting Group, a
Royalston, Mass.-based firm that evaluates the value of major
IT purchases. “Not only is the cost of electricity growing, but
it’s unpredictable. Business CFOs do not like unpredictable.
They’d rather pay too much in the beginning and not face too
many surprises along the way.”
One way to handle the electricity problem is with virtualization, which also provides speed
and flexibility. “Virtualization allows you
to bring new virtual servers online in
a matter of days, not months,” Barclay
explains. “Without it, a company with a
great product line and an idea can miss a
desired market window because its I T can’t
respond in time. With virtualization, it can
meet the early portion of that window.”
Server consolidation customers are
saving from 25 percent to 45 percent in
utility costs alone, according to a 2008
survey of 800 global corporations conducted jointly by research firm Information
Technology Intelligence and security software provider Sunbelt Software. And virtualization/consolidation continues to build
momentum. Blade servers account for just
over 10 percent of servers sold today, IDC
reports, but will account for more than one-quarter of all server shipments by 2011.
“Besides being good for the environment, virtualization is a darn good business strategy,” says Mark Lutchen, a
principal in PricewaterhouseCoopers’ advisory practice and
author of Managing IT as a Business.
In a recent survey of senior executives in five key regions,
PricewaterhouseCoopers found that energy costs are paramount. In fact, 60 percent of the respondents said potential
energy savings represent the most important factor in their
companies’ environmental decision making.
MERGERS LEAD TO IT CONSOLIDATION
Over the last decade, corporate consolidation has created the
need for server consolidation. Mergers and acquisitions have
resulted in decentralized technology scat-
tered throughout the world.
“Now, for a variety of reasons, companies are compelled to standardize and bring
these disparate technologies together,”
Lutchen says. “Why buy a server every time
you implement a new system? You’ll have
600 servers, and many of them will be used
at just 30 percent capacity.”
The merger of telecom companies
Alcatel and Lucent in late 2006 is a
prime example. Even before the merger,
the two companies planned data center
consolidations. Now operating as Alcatel-Lucent, the company has its consolidation
plan well under way. It is using Hewlett-Packard-supplied consultancy services
and HP power-saving servers, resulting in
the consolidation of 25 data centers and
125 server rooms into six data centers and
a very small but still-to-be-determined
number of server rooms.
Another HP customer, Mitel Networks, is saving 300,000
a year by reducing its servers from 12 to two and its processors from 24 to 12. And Pfizer is saving considerable but
Virtualizing the Endpoint
CONSIDER THIS SCENARIO: A MAN-
ufacturing executive is caught up in a
huge inventory/accounting project that
must be finished by the next morning.
But 5 p.m. is approaching, and the
executive needs to get home to take
over parental duties while the exec’s
spouse heads out for a PTA meeting.
Fortunately, thanks to continued
developments in endpoint virtualization technologies, it’s easier than ever
for the executive to access the needed
Excel file and other work-based applications from a laptop at home in order
to complete the job on time.
Seeing the value in this and other
benefits to endpoint virtualization—
which essentially allows applications
to be added and integrated within an
enterprise with considerably fewer
system glitches than ever—more IT
decision makers are buying solutions
that encompass this technology.
In fact, more than three out of four
of the approximately 300 IT administrators who responded to a recent survey
said their organizations had already
launched some form of endpoint virtualization, according to Symantec,
which commissioned the study.
“That response surprises us,” says
Brad Rowland, director of enterprise
marketing for Symantec’s endpoint virtualization line. “This technology is just
starting to be included in larger solutions. Before, this was made available
as a point-by-point solution that had to
be managed separately. Now, it’s part
of a larger platform, and that’s leading
to broader acceptance.”
Here are some additional findings:
• 24 percent of participants said the
simplification of operating system
and application delivery is the
most appealing aspect of endpoint
virtualization, while 20 percent
said lower IT costs offered the
greatest appeal.
• 31 percent reported that their organizations spend at least 21 percent
of IT resources on managing incom-patibilities between applications on
endpoint devices.
• 36 percent said that at least a
quarter of their entire 2009 IT budget
is earmarked for endpoint virtualization initiatives. —D.M.